Charles. Charles Darwin I am typing about. 19th century, city of my beloved London. Travel back in time with me.
Suppose, I am acting as a whathappnd scientist, a historian, at the moment. Suppose now, that Charles Darwin himself, appeared not to be that satified about the findings the team did during the Beagle expedition. Charles himself had a talent for making drawings. He, unfortunately, didn't have much talent for linguistics.
How do I know? Well, I have a theory, based on some genetics, a love affair Charles was involved in, a historical typing of the midst of the 19th century in Western Europe, whereabout a lot of historians ( male and female ) nowadays are consented about, the dressing talent of Charles and a fourth and fifth argument on social patterns, naming that Charles didn't have the mother with the right status to introduce him to the family with a daughter he desires to marry and focussing on group thinking and social exclusion or desertion by not getting maried the one woman a man desires.
Exclusion argument.
His grand father was a free spirit, a genius up North. In Scotland in this case. A cowboy ( Scottish highlanders are still a very strong, wild and hairy sort of cows, they do not need herding, so cowboys then didn't have much practical things to do, they spent a lot of time, thinking, dreaming, planning, chewing) at rest, avant la lettre. Or must I write, avant le garde? In the case Charles, Charles Darwin, it is highly, very well, assumable that the actions of Charles are due to a combination of five typical social patterns. Did the young Charles not happen to be utterly in love with a beautiful lady his own age or a girl, probably seven years younger, the years before he set sail with the Beagle? He or someone on his behalf decided that he had to leave, to desert England for a while, to recover from his unbearable heartaches, exhaustion and anxiety. Social pattern one.
To be continued......genetics argument, more about grandpa, pensionado, Darwin.
Suppose, I am acting as a whathappnd scientist, a historian, at the moment. Suppose now, that Charles Darwin himself, appeared not to be that satified about the findings the team did during the Beagle expedition. Charles himself had a talent for making drawings. He, unfortunately, didn't have much talent for linguistics.
How do I know? Well, I have a theory, based on some genetics, a love affair Charles was involved in, a historical typing of the midst of the 19th century in Western Europe, whereabout a lot of historians ( male and female ) nowadays are consented about, the dressing talent of Charles and a fourth and fifth argument on social patterns, naming that Charles didn't have the mother with the right status to introduce him to the family with a daughter he desires to marry and focussing on group thinking and social exclusion or desertion by not getting maried the one woman a man desires.
Exclusion argument.
His grand father was a free spirit, a genius up North. In Scotland in this case. A cowboy ( Scottish highlanders are still a very strong, wild and hairy sort of cows, they do not need herding, so cowboys then didn't have much practical things to do, they spent a lot of time, thinking, dreaming, planning, chewing) at rest, avant la lettre. Or must I write, avant le garde? In the case Charles, Charles Darwin, it is highly, very well, assumable that the actions of Charles are due to a combination of five typical social patterns. Did the young Charles not happen to be utterly in love with a beautiful lady his own age or a girl, probably seven years younger, the years before he set sail with the Beagle? He or someone on his behalf decided that he had to leave, to desert England for a while, to recover from his unbearable heartaches, exhaustion and anxiety. Social pattern one.
To be continued......genetics argument, more about grandpa, pensionado, Darwin.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten